Engage 2011: How to Increase Your Facebook Fan Base—Maximizing Engagement with Likes and Shares

Room: Yosemite A/Marketer Track Presenters: Dennis Yu, Webtrends and Veronica Stecker, Gordmans Description: “Get the big tips you need to know to maximize engagement with likes and shares." Facebook advertising seems complicated, with a lot of emphasis on tiny percentages and acronyms like CPC, CTR and CPC. Questions about using Facebook for marketing range from “So you have lots of fans? So what?” to concerns about privacy and ad bombardment in our personal lives. However, Facebook fans are super valuable, and that’s no secret. As Dennis Yu says, if 2010 was the year of acquiring fans, then 2011 is the year of figuring out what to do with them. Three Main Ways To Measure Facebook Fans There are three ways to measure the value of your Facebook fans:
  • Earned media—How many fans times, how often they post and how much would it cost in other media to get the same thing. When using Facebook to advertise, consider what it would cost you to get the same impression from TV or other media?
  • Lead Value—Score how hot your leads are and how active they are on your Facebook page.
  • Direct Conversion Value—Coupon redemption rates, geographic split on ads, how many fans become purchasers.
One thing that’s often overlooked in direct conversion is the “flow-over” that starts with the web, not just ends there. For example, it makes sense that people would see an ad on television and go to that company’s Facebook page, but marketers don’t generally think about people seeking out a company’s Facebook page first. That needs to change, Yu says. “There’s power in being able to track back from a purchase to see where the customer first ‘liked’ the product,” he says. Who Likes What Both Yu and fellow presenter Veronica Stecker of Gordmans agree: the main pitfall in Facebook advertising revolves around confusing the number of Facebook fans with actual engagement. Yu defines engagement as the number of likes and comments on a Facebook page divided by the total number of fans.
  • For example, in the fast food industry, McDonalds has the most fans, but Jack In The Box fans are much more engaged.
  • For hotels, Hilton has more fans than Best Western, Marriot, Holiday Inn or La Quinta. However, Hilton only has 149 fans per hotel location. Considering the amount of people who move through Hilton’s lobbies across the globe, that number should be higher and more engaged.
  • Banks perform even worse. Bank of America leads in number of fans over Wells Fargo, Sun Trust, and Key Bank, but Bank of America only has 7500 fans—less than two fans per branch.
  • For sports leagues, the NBA has more Facebook fans, but Major League Baseball fans have more engagement.
  • In shoes, Converse leads Nike, Puma, Adidas and New Balance with 11 million fans, but Converse fans are also much more active. Why? Higher resonance with Facebook users through Converse’s Chuck Taylor line.
Yu points out that “overlap” must be taken into account for brands, too. For example, Tiger Woods has more fans than Nike golf, but the two are intricately linked. Let the Fans Do the Advertising For You For businesses and brands, it costs about one or two dollars to get one Facebook fan. Some spend more, some less. (Starbucks spends about $10 per fan!) The value of these fans is that they will do your advertising for you. “Fans loading photos of your product costs you nothing!” Yu notes. And friends of your brand have friends: a huge source for new business. The average Facebook user makes 3 to 4 “likes” per day, and their friends usually take note of that. “You have existing people who love you,” Yu says, “So the genius is to get those people to reach out to their friends.” Using word of mouth as the best form of advertising? A stroke of genius, indeed.

Why Facebook Advertising Is So Misunderstood

Our Facebook report, which was released last week stirred up some common myths about Facebook advertising. Facebook ad performance is abysmal compared to other display or pay-per-click ads CTRs may be relatively low, but what should really matter to you is your goal. If you are a direct marketer, you're probably looking at conversions and cost per conversion. If your metric is lead gen, then you might look at emails collected or new fans. If you're a brand, consider reach, engagement, and earned media. Consider that a single prominent leaderboard or LREC ad in display may get a multiple of the CTR for a text ad below the fold of a page. More ads on one page mean fewer opportunities for any one ad to get the click. Facebook has increased the number of ads per page to where there are now up to 5 ads per pageview vs only 3 before (not counting the homepage premium ads). We'd argue that the growth in ad units per page has more than outpaced an apparent decline in CTR. Targeting and depth of relationship makes comparisons apples-to-oranges We described how friend of fan ads (those with social impressions) can often garner twice the click-through rate. The same is true in the non-Facebook world for retargeting (showing ads to people who have been to your site) and branded search (people who are actually navigating vs searching). In fact, you may even compare the spectrum of a Facebook ad's performance to its older brother— email. Spam email (unwanted commercial contact) gets horrible open and click rates, while messages to a well-kept house list can get 40% opens and 50% clicks to open rates. In Facebook, a super targeted ad to your existing fans is more like and email than an ad— it's wanted messaging that is helpful, personalized, and informative. Advertisers aren't yet armed with the proper tools and training If leveraging social context is the key to great CTR as well as conversion, then the larger the social graph, the easier it is to get a friend-of-fan connection. The network effect applies. But we are just at the beginning stage of Facebook advertising, as most brands are not targeting or using the power of endorsements. A simple way to prove this— the cost of super targeted traffic is often the same as untargeted 18+ traffic, which is the default. Facebook will eventually morph into an efficient ecosystem where each niche is priced accordingly, based on market value. Right now, you can get gold at the price of sand. Market competition is starting to drive the price up Yogi Berra once said when asked why he didn’t go to a popular restaurant "Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded." Demand on Facebook is outstripping the massive increase in supply. Considering that average display prices are $2-5 CPMs, a 30 cent CPM on Facebook for traffic that can be better targeted is as great deal at any metric applied. To reiterate the Google growth curve against what Facebook is about to experience, the 5 cent clicks in 2002 on AdWords are now 50 cents. And with smarter advertisers on Facebook, this same curve will apply. Get it while the traffic is cheap. The entire store is on sale No, Facebook doesn't compensate us to say this, nor is this a blind frenzy. Rather, the cost to build your brand's fan base or revenues is at a significant discount now, for example, as shown by Rosetta Stone and Virgin Mobile Qatar. As more metrics-based case studies come forward, especially those that show the offline impact of online efforts, the "ultraviolet" layer of influence, also called "word of mouth", becomes measurable. Until attribution is in place, Facebook marketing is educated guesswork We know that marketing channels work in tandem to influence each other. The question is how much credit to allocate to an "assist". The world of marketing measurement is nearly exclusively last click— the last click a user has gets 100% credit, while the other touchpoints along the way get zero credit. The disproportionate credit goes often to search, robbing the fact that you have a strong brand, a good product, significant word of mouth marketing, and social efforts. When these channels are properly weighted, we predict that ad rates will significantly increase. Are there other myths or misconceptions you've heard? Or other questions that you're interested in getting to the bottom of? Leave us a comment and we'll get you the answers or join us in one of our upcoming Facebook webinars.

Digital Futures – What You Need To Know For 2011

We contributed to a recent futuregazing article - you can read our thoughts on social media optimisation below, or read the article on UTalkMarketing. There is no doubt that 2010 was the year of social media. Facebook became a dominant force overtaking Google as the site people spend most time on and, meanwhile, Twitter became ubiquitous and its power in circulating news or gossip became clear. Elsewhere the phenomenally popular iPad and the increased penetration of smartphone made apps the must have marketing tool, and online video had a resurgence as the perfect solution to the demand for ‘shareable’ content. But what trends does 2011 hold for marketer and their brands? UTalkMarketing highlights ten key areas to watch over the next 12 months. Social Commerce Facebook predicts a social commerce revolution in 2011, and this year social media will become more ingrained in everyday consumer life than ever before. As Chris Maples, commercial director at Microsoft Advertising puts it, “social media is the internet”. Therefore it’s only natural that marketers should be looking beyond simply having a presence in the space and towards monetising it. Successful social commerce strategy will be built around user reviews. People trust products and services endorsed by friends – a fact that makes social commerce a hugely lucrative opportunity for advertisers. An increasingly sophisticated relationship between social media and search will enhance opportunities in social commerce. “The tighter interweave between social media and search is so exciting: search results will become increasingly influenced by what searchers’ friends and peers think is relevant. “Search results will begin to rely more on users’ social context. Bing has already started with its Facebook partnership in the US, but that is only a first step,” says Maples. “Marketers will need to think in terms of combining [search and social media] disciplines, which no longer exist in silos”. Retail sites are also starting to experiment with customer curation – using social technology to give customers a say on inventory. Social Media Optimisation As social networking sites emerge as sales channels in their own right, so brands will need to look beyond simply having a presence on them, and towards identifying and focusing efforts on the sites that provide most benefit for them. “In all likelihood, your organisation has joined the conversation. But how effective is your programme, does it support your overall brand strategy?” asks Thomas Mueller, global digital director at strategic branding company siegel+gale. Social media can help to build stronger and deeper relationships, but only if brands identify which platforms work best for them and concentrate their efforts. “If you’re a small company dealing in products which aren’t engaging, like concrete or electrical components, to devote a huge amount of your marketing budget to Facebook would be a mistake, as the volume of people interested will be minimal. Whereas a viral campaign can increase mentions of a ‘less sexy’ brand across these channels,” says Christian Howes, head of solutions engineering at digital agency Webtrends. Brands will increasingly perform social media ‘health-checks’ as standard, to keep track of how social media activity is helping to forge meaningful relationships with audiences. “[Brands will] use insights arising from an agreed set of social media performance indicators. They will learn to swiftly respond to what these indicators are telling them about their market-place, customer and competitor behaviour in social spaces,” predicts Iain MacMillan, director of social media agency RMM. Location Based Services/ M-commerce The prolific rise in the number of consumers using smartphones, and their eagerness to access the internet via them, has set the stage for an exciting year in terms of m-commerce opportunities. Figures released this week by ForeSee suggest that one third of shoppers in the UK are now accessing retailer websites through their handsets. “Over the next 12 months we will see a rise in the number of retailers focusing on fully-transactional mobile operations. These include in-store check-ins, bar-code scanning for pricing and comparison information via mobile cameras,” says James Cronin, CTO of e-commerce solutions provider Venda. Mobile CRM strategy will become one of the key focuses for m-commerce savvy brands. Supermarkets are already exploring opportunities here by, for example, issuing customers who have not visited their local store for a time with a mobile coupon enticing them back. AdMob, Google's mobile advertising network, now receives more than two billion requests for ads per day. To put it into context, that's four times more than the number of requests the company was getting just a year ago. Location based services will come of age as m-commerce opportunities do. “Location-based marketing will reach mass adoption, and when bundled with customer lifestyle marketing, customers will soon receive highly relevant and personalised offers and promotions at exactly the right time, through their mobiles,” predicts Colin McCaffery, director of products at 2ergo. Meanwhile O2 and Orange have both just announced that they will offer brands the opportunity to target subscribers later this year. Customers who opt in to receive ads will be able to redeem in-store offers by paying via their handsets. Apps Vs Websites Depending on which tech commentator you are reading, apps will kill off websites within five years; or the future will be dominated by cross-platform browser-based mobile websites. According to Alistair Crane, chief executive of app developer Grapple Mobile, the reality is less dramatic. “They will exist in collaboration like TV and radio,” he explains. Apps and browser-based sites have their own merits, typically that, at present, apps present a richer mobile experience, make money and collect customer data but app platforms are fragmented, which can make development expensive. Mobile optimised websites are cheaper because as one site can be read on every device and a site can be updated easily and regularly, whereas apps have to be updated with user consent. But marketers do not need to choose between the two. As Mads Holst, founder of agency Holst Digital, says: “Websites are the shop front, the introduction. Apps are the long term relationship.” For Crane, 2011 will see apps become more viable for all brands as developers can now create code that can be used on all platforms; whilst Holst believes brands will redesign their mobile websites to emulate the simplicity and usability of apps, and apps themselves go the other way and will be driven about content and functionality. Search and Local Results Mobile is the new battle ground in search, with Google openly admitting it is a major area of focus for 2011. According to analysts, mobile search queries have increased five fold in the past two years and, as smartphone and tablet penetration increases, that rate is accelerating. These searches tend to seek fresh; real time information that is relevant to the user’s location meaning fast, tailored local results and reviews (and advertising?). 2011 will see consumers start to expect this as the norm via mobile search. This is mirrored in the success of US-based social networking, user review and local search site Yelp.com. The site had more than 31 million monthly unique users last year and it is all about being local. The search engine asks users what they are looking for and the location from which the search should be performed. Listings include a rating, user-reviews and details such as opening hours. In terms of social networking, Yelp has taken this one step further than an online community by holding offline events in various cities for its most prolific users, creating an “elite” circle of advocates and reviewers. “Location-based search can be incredibly powerful,” says Holst but he warns that existing services can still be viewed as intrusive with results often not accurate or relevant enough. “There is obvious potential for mobile platforms but it has to be done in the right way.” Real Time Marketing Another growth area but also another that has the potential to spark controversy, brands are increasing expected to engage in real time marketing. Last year’s Old Spice campaign, which started as a TV campaign and moved into social media with videos posted to YouTube in response to messages on Twitter, showed how to do it with much humour and panache. Other examples are sadly lacking at the start of 2011. James Kirkham, managing director at digital agency Holler, says the inexorable rise of Twitter and Facebook means people expect a real time response, and savvy brands are beginning to realise that they can not only use it to arrest negative chatter but to tap into consumer whims. He explains: “If someone expresses their hunger, how nice to be sent some cereal bars? Brands can combine clever sampling with new direct marketing and smart guerilla ambient stunts all in one - all by listening in on the conversation.” But he adds that brands also will get sick of appeasing those that moan for the sake of it and, as a result, marketers will work out how to use these mechanics, tactics and channels for more positive but tailored means. “This should be the year brands use real time marketing for smart positive effect,” Kirkham says. Digital Experiential With people increasingly spending their free time indulging in two screen activity, using a mobile device or laptop while watching TV, exploring a brand after being prompted by an advert is becoming the norm. According to Holler’s Kirkham, 2011 will see a more general convergence as the division between activities and channels dissolves. “Digital isn’t just a channel, instead it just permeates everything everywhere, so it isn’t about print or TV or online.” He points out that QR codes, which will make a successful comeback in 2011, and Facebook Places have already begun to appear on outdoor ads, and this will mean that consumers will expect to be “surprised and delighted” not just by a TV ad but by how campaigns are extended to other devices and into different parts of consumers lives. Meanwhile, as touch screen technology becomes the accepted method of interaction, particularly on mobile devices, brands will be expected to have a tactile, engaging online experience to match. Holst says that this will become more exciting now the limitations of Adobe Flash, which has been shunned by Apple in favour of HTML5, have been removed. He predicts that 2011 will see more brands using touch-screen technology, 3D and augmented reality and, in the first instance, it will lead to a significant change in how consumers interact with online shopping mechanisms. Interactive TV Developments in the internet TV space will offering exciting opportunities for advertisers, who will reap the benefits from an unprecedented level of targeting. YouView, which got the green light from UK media watchdog Ofcom in October, is hotly tipped to make IPTV mainstream in the UK. Due to launch this spring with partners including the BBC, ITV and Channel 4, it will bring video on demand and web content to TV. For advertisers this presents a single platform on which they can hone in on niche audiences, provided that the competing broadcasters on its board can agree on a unified strategy for the project. “For advertisers, VoD will become a serious business for service providers looking to increase audiences and brands looking to get a bigger return for their marketing money. Broadcasters need to get their service offering just right if they're to grab a sizeable chunk of this business,” says Tom Cape, managing director of digital agency Capablue. Successful online TV streaming will be placed behind paywalls. Google TV, when it launches this year, will be the Internet TV platform to watch. Google is great at generating revenue from advertisers, search and recommendation – something that walled garden content providers are still getting to grips with. Social Gaming Social gaming is being tipped as one of the fastest growth areas in digital – a report released last week by Juniper Research suggests that in the next five years, ad spend on mobile gaming alone will increase ten-fold to be worth £574m. For brands, social gaming offers entertainment - a means of creating emotional connections with many consumers simultaneously. Zynga, creator of the immensely popular FarmVille amongst others, dominates the social gaming sector. But there are a wide range of developers and a plethora of popular gaming titles flooding the market – a trend set to grow in 2011. Embedding games into social networking sites has allowed it to become main stream – and the element of being able to share the experience online with friends is giving rise of a whole new type of gamer. Do not think geeky teenage boy locked away in the bedroom – research suggests that men and women of all ages are equally likely enjoy social games. The opportunities for marketers in 2011 will be numerous. Within social games branded content, the sale of virtual goods and in-game advertising are all possibilities to be explored. Ones to watch and learn from include Disney and McDonalds, both of whom are showing their belief in the power of social gaming by investing in the channel. Whilst Disney has acquired social gaming startup Playdom, McDonalds has created a branded farm within FarmVille. Branding through digital reaches a tipping point driven by FMCG After a faltering start in the world of digital advertising, FMCG companies have finally managed to make their mark through social media. The level of news, such as product innovation and marketing and advertising stories, churned out by these companies suits social media’s appetite for more and more new, real time information. That said FMCG clients remain unconvinced about digital as a brand building tool. Mark Brown, strategy director at digital agency Weapon7, says FMCG marketers know that they have to learn to understand it but the historical stumbling block remains – how to measure the effectiveness. “That is the real challenge,” he adds. “Digital is always seen as the cheaper media that can produce some ‘cool’ stuff but any campaigns almost always have to be smaller scale. These tend to be highly effective but against a small scale.” To reach the tipping point, he adds, a fundamental shift in client thinking is necessary so they realise the importance of allocating budget to developing research and tracking methods to measure effectiveness. “For that to happened,” says Brown. “FMCG companies need people who recognise how brands are built and how to measure that but also understand that digital can be a powerful brand building tool.” Will that happen in 2011? “I am convinced this year will see some strong case studies about innovative ways to measure the brand effect.”

Measuring the Trends Behind 4.5 Billion Facebook Ad Impressions

Webtrends aggregates a massive amount of data from Facebook ad campaigns that we've either run or white-labeled for other agencies. We decided to take a look at some of data that these campaigns have generated to see what trends would emerge. The result is our latest white paper, Facebook Advertising Performance, Benchmarks & Insights Our sample group examined 11,529 campaigns serving 4.5 billion impressions that logged 2.2 million clicks. It represents approximately 11% of the Facebook advertising data we've collected since June 2007, as we've chosen to look at only the most recent snapshots. We wanted to talk about methodology in this and share insights on how large campaigns are run. Facebook provides reports for Responder Demographics and Responder Profiles in the self-serve UI. These are in addition to the Advertising Performance reports that you may normally run to get performance break-outs at the campaign and ad level. The demographic reports break out impressions and click share by pre-defined age-range buckets, gender and geography. That's why you see these particular age cuts in our reporting. Whether you actually segment your ad campaigns along these lines or not, these break-outs still show in your reporting. Sophisticated advertisers use this insight to determine what segments are getting the best traction (and indirectly, the lowest cost per fan). You can, however, get demographic performance by setting up a number of ads multiplied by these same buckets or other more granular buckets. These numbers will often align with Facebook's responder reporting. Where we've broken out demographic data, we've primarily used responder reporting data rather than targeted segments from ad-level data. Note that Facebook provides this responder data at the campaign level, so you cannot de-aggreagate at the ad level. In spite of this disadvantage, we believe that these stats were more appropriate to use than ad-level data from our own segments because Facebook's eCPM algorithm will skew inventory to what generates a higher CTR when you specify CPC as your targeted metric. This means that Facebook will choose inventory on your behalf in order to get more clicks (if you're telling them you want clicks). Facebook doesn't currently have negation targeting, so you're not able to specify that you don't want app traffic or that you want to exclude particular interests. You may notice in your own Facebook ad reports that the number of unique impressions and unique clicks is significantly lower than the served impressions and reported clicks. Facebook doesn't have frequency capping yet, which means a certain pool of very active users may consume a large share of your inventory. This was a major problem for Google for in the first five years of AdSense, with publishers (those who have inventory to sell) often complaining that 90% of their inventories were being consumed by 10% of the users. This significantly reduced CTR — after an individual sees an ad 10 times, the next 100 impressions won't have an impact. Of the 4.5 billion impressions, we served 523 million unique impressions, meaning that on average, we served nine ads to each user. The ratio overlap is actually higher than what it initially appears, since a campaign could have 50 ads that theoretically served just once to a user, but it still counts as 50 unique impressions. Of the 2.2 million clicks, 2.1 million were unique, meaning that users rarely click on the same ad more than once. Facebook does have a click fraud algorithm that removes duplicate clicks and bot actions, but the logic is proprietary, so it's not possible to gauge the exact impact. The overall CTR of 0.050% may be higher than the Facebook average for US based traffic because of a heavy proportion of ads being targeted to fans and friends of fans. As we've discussed, adding social endorsements dramatically increases CTR, often by more than double. Thus, the CTR you should use as your benchmark should be based not on the average CTR for our study or your colleague's campaign, but on the proportion of your ads that have social impressions and/or are targeted at fans. Comparing CTRs on Facebook to general display advertising is difficult. For example, retargeting or branded ads will drive a much higher CTR than remnant inventory on any site. The size of the ad, placement, and number of ads on the page also contribute heavily to CTR. Facebook's inventory runs in a standardized format, which makes it easier to compare one Facebook creative against another. Timing is also key, particularly when it pertains to breaking news. When word of Michael Jackson's death first hit, we had Facebook ads up within 10 minutes for a social search engine. The CTR on those ads were in excess of 1% during the first 12 hours, but the declination occurred swiftly as the news lost its immediacy. With highly targeted ads, it's not uncommon to get 0.200% within the first few hours, with ad burnout taking place within 72 hours. The more precise the target, the better the initial CTR, but a smaller audience also means that the ads burnout with fewer impressions. If there frequency capping, ads could live longer, but until it's in place, we've recommended using friend-of-fan targeting and non-fan targeting to keep ads alive. The friend-of-fan targeting continues to feed in fresh users to target as new fans join. The non-fan targets ensure these ads don't hit users who are already friends. Several advertisers believe that blind multiplication of ads are a sophisticated approach to test ads and prevent burnout. This is akin to a job hunter blasting a resume to hundreds of employers in the belief that the law of large numbers applies. Our data demonstrates that with blind multiplication, ads do not evenly receive traffic. In a followup post, we will analyze the distributions of popular and unpopular ads to demonstrate how heavily Facebook favors just a few ads. We'll also show how many ads a campaign should have based on factors such as total spend, estimated size of audience and value of a fan. For now though, please sound off in the comments with any questions you might have about the data that we've shared.

Measuring the Social State of the Union

Since the State of the Union is kind of a big deal, we decided to take a look at the key topics mentioned during the speech and see which ones were getting the most online traction. Over 240,237 conversations were detected over the past 24 hours using Webtrends Social Measurement. Key Topics An analysis of the primary keywords circling the State of the Union revealed that the key topics being discussed following the speech: economy, education, military, innovation and health care. Of these topics, discussion of the economy held a strong lead over competing points of interest, with 10,249 mentions. Education came in second with 7,081 mentions, while military, innovation and health care all received about 5,000. Foreign Policy In contrast to the key topics above, foreign policy generated far fewer discussions than it has in previous years. Afghanistan was mentioned 1,877 times, compared to 1,813 for Iraq Political Parties Republicans managed to hit 11,301 mentions, which was enough to beat out 7,113 mentions for the Democrats. The Tea Party trailed with just 5,360 mentions of Michele Bachmann's rebuttal. Other Points President Obama's smoked salmon joke might have gotten laughs and dominated NPR's poll of what people remembered from the speech, but it generated just 1,546 mentions. More substantive comments such as achieving a "sputnik moment" and "win the future" logged 5,155 and 2,924 mentions respectfully. And finally, Michelle Obama's dress, always a hot topic during presidential events, was mentioned 311 times.